The ClinGen Evidence Repository is an FDA-recognized human genetic variant database containing expert-curated assertions regarding variants' pathogenicity and supporting evidence summaries. [Disclaimer]


Variant: NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1320+1G>C

CA10588622

265635 (ClinVar)

Gene: CDH1
Condition: CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer
Inheritance Mode: Autosomal dominant inheritance
UUID: 9edb42a6-d4f3-408e-857f-aa10c232bd15
Approved on: 2023-08-24
Published on: 2023-08-24

HGVS expressions

NM_004360.5:c.1320+1G>C
NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1320+1G>C
NC_000016.10:g.68813496G>C
CM000678.2:g.68813496G>C
NC_000016.9:g.68847399G>C
CM000678.1:g.68847399G>C
NC_000016.8:g.67404900G>C
NG_008021.1:g.81205G>C
ENST00000261769.10:c.1320+1G>C
ENST00000261769.9:c.1320+1G>C
ENST00000422392.6:c.1137+1233G>C
ENST00000562836.5:n.1391+1G>C
ENST00000566510.5:c.1165G>C
ENST00000566612.5:c.1320+1G>C
ENST00000611625.4:c.1320+1G>C
ENST00000612417.4:c.1320+1G>C
ENST00000621016.4:c.1320+1G>C
NM_004360.3:c.1320+1G>C
NM_001317184.1:c.1137+1233G>C
NM_001317185.1:c.-295G>C
NM_001317186.1:c.-500+1G>C
NM_004360.4:c.1320+1G>C
NM_001317184.2:c.1137+1233G>C
NM_001317185.2:c.-295G>C
NM_001317186.2:c.-500+1G>C
More

Likely Pathogenic

Met criteria codes 5
PS4_Supporting PVS1_Strong PM5_Supporting PS3_Supporting PM2_Supporting
Not Met criteria codes 21
BA1 BS2 BS4 BS3 BS1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP1 BP5 BP7 PS2 PS1 PP1 PP4 PP3 PP2 PM6 PM3 PM4 PM1

Evidence Links 0

Expert Panel

Criteria Specification Information

Criteria Specification: ClinGen CDH1 Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1

Criteria Specification Approval History
Criteria Specifications for this VCEP
Evidence submitted by expert panel
CDH1 VCEP
The c.1320+1G>C variant occurs at the canonical splice donor site of exon 9 (PVS1_strong, PM5_supporting). This variant is absent from populations in gnomAD (PM2_supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Splicing analysis in vitro has shown that the C allele results in skipping of exon 9, producing an abnormal in-frame transcript (PS3_supporting; PMID: 8033105, 28301459). Furthermore, this variant has been observed in at least one family meeting IGCLC criteria for HDGC (PS4_supporting; SCV000322628.7). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely pathogenic based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PVS1_strong, PM2_supporting, PS3_supporting, PS4_supporting, PM5_supporting.
Met criteria codes
PS4_Supporting
This variant was observed in an individual with gastric cancer in 20s with signet ring cells (GeneDx). This variant was reported in a family with blepharocheilodontic syndrome and gastric cancer (unknown histology) diagnosed under 35 years (PMID: 28301459).
PVS1_Strong
This variant occurs at the canonical splice donor site of exon 9.
PM5_Supporting
Apply PM5_Supporting to the variant with the alteration at canonical splicing site.
PS3_Supporting
This variant has been shown to result in skipping of exon 9, producing an abnormal in-frame transcript (PMID: 8033105, 28301459).
PM2_Supporting
This variant is absent from gnomAD.
Not Met criteria codes
BA1
This variant is absent from gnomAD.
BS2
This variant was observed in an individual with gastric cancer in 20s with signet ring cells (GeneDx). This variant was reported in a family with blepharocheilodontic syndrome and gastric cancer (unknown histology) diagnosed under 35 years (PMID: 28301459).
BS4
This variant was shown to segregate with disease in a family with autosomal dominant blepharocheilodontic syndrome and gastric cancer diagnosed under 35 years in one carrier. However, pathology reports for this cancer were not available. To our knowledge, segregation of this variant has not been shown in a family meeting IGCLC criteria for HDGC.
BS3
This variant has been shown to result in skipping of exon 9, producing an abnormal in-frame transcript.
BS1
This variant is absent from gnomAD.
BP2
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in cis or trans with a pathogenic variant.
BP3
BP3 does not apply to CDH1.
BP4
No code specific comments provided, please refer to the summary above or general recommendations provided in the guideline
BP1
BP1 does not apply to CDH1.
BP5
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
BP7
BP7 does not apply to this variant.
PS2
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as de novo.
PS1
To our knowledge, a previously established pathogenic variant at this position has not been reported.
PP1
This variant was shown to segregate with disease in a family with autosomal dominant blepharocheilodontic syndrome and gastric cancer diagnosed under 35 years in one carrier. However, pathology reports for this cancer were not available. To our knowledge, segregation of this variant has not been shown in a family meeting IGCLC criteria for HDGC.
PP4
PP4 does not apply to CDH1.
PP3
PP3 does not apply to this variant.
PP2
PP2 does not apply to CDH1.
PM6
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as de novo.
PM3
PM3 does not apply to CDH1.
PM4
PM4 does not apply to this variant.
PM1
PM1 does not apply to CDH1.
Curation History
The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.
¤ Powered by BCM's Genboree.