The ClinGen Evidence Repository is an FDA-recognized human genetic variant database containing expert-curated assertions regarding variants' pathogenicity and supporting evidence summaries. [Disclaimer]


Variant: NM_001754.5(RUNX1):c.741C>T (p.Pro247=)

CA16616523

415835 (ClinVar)

Gene: RUNX1
Condition: hereditary thrombocytopenia and hematologic cancer predisposition syndrome
Inheritance Mode: Autosomal dominant inheritance
UUID: 2f04ea68-4598-4d14-a8ac-578110f008a4
Approved on: 2022-07-07
Published on: 2022-07-07

HGVS expressions

NM_001754.5:c.741C>T
NM_001754.5(RUNX1):c.741C>T (p.Pro247=)
NC_000021.9:g.34834474G>A
CM000683.2:g.34834474G>A
NC_000021.8:g.36206771G>A
CM000683.1:g.36206771G>A
NC_000021.7:g.35128641G>A
NG_011402.2:g.1155238C>T
ENST00000675419.1:c.741C>T
ENST00000300305.7:c.741C>T
ENST00000344691.8:c.660C>T
ENST00000358356.9:c.660C>T
ENST00000399237.6:c.705C>T
ENST00000399240.5:c.532+25000C>T
ENST00000437180.5:c.741C>T
ENST00000469087.1:n.277C>T
ENST00000482318.5:c.*331C>T
NM_001001890.2:c.660C>T
NM_001122607.1:c.660C>T
NM_001754.4:c.741C>T
NM_001001890.3:c.660C>T
NM_001122607.2:c.660C>T
More

Likely Benign

The Expert Panel has overridden the computationally generated classification - "Uncertain Significance - Conflicting Evidence"
Met criteria codes 3
PM2_Supporting BP4 BP7
Not Met criteria codes 23
BA1 PM5 PM1 PM3 PM4 PM6 BS2 PVS1 BS4 BS3 BS1 BP2 BP3 BP1 BP5 PS1 PS2 PS4 PS3 PP1 PP4 PP3 PP2

Evidence Links 0

Expert Panel

Criteria Specification Information

Criteria Specification: ClinGen Myeloid Malignancy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 2

PDF
Criteria Specification Approval History
Criteria Specifications for this VCEP
Evidence submitted by expert panel
Myeloid Malignancy VCEP
NM_001754.5(RUNX1):c.741C>T (p.Pro247=) is a synonymous variant. As such, a REVEL score is not calculable, and there is no predicted effect on protein function. SpliceAI predicted the following: Acceptor loss 0, Donor loss 0, Acceptor gain 0, Donor gain 0. As such, there is no in silico evidence of an effect on splicing(BP4). Evolutionary conservation prediction algorithms predict the site as not being conserved (PhyloP score 1.06724 < 2.0)(BP7). This variant is completely absent from all population databases with at least 20x coverage for RUNX1(PM2_supporting). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Myeloid Malignancy Variant Curation Expert Panel for RUNX1: BP4, BP7, PM2_supporting.
Met criteria codes
PM2_Supporting
This variant is completely absent from all population databases with at least 20x coverage for RUNX1. PM2_SUPPORTING IS MET.
BP4
This variant is a SYNONYMOUS variant, which does not result in a protein codon change. As such, a REVEL score is not calculable, and there is no predicted effect on protein function. SpliceAI predicted the following: Acceptor loss 0, Donor loss 0, Acceptor gain 0, Donor gain 0. As such, there is no in silico evidence of an effect on splicing. Therefore, BP4 IS MET.
BP7
This variant is a SYNONYMOUS variant, which does not result in a protein codon change. As such, a REVEL score is not calculable, and there is no predicted effect on protein function. SpliceAI predicted the following: Acceptor loss 0, Donor loss 0, Acceptor gain 0, Donor gain 0. As such, there is no in silico evidence of an effect on splicing. Evolutionary conservation prediction algorithms predict the site as not being conserved (PhyloP score 1.06724 < 2.0) Therefore, BP7 IS MET.
Not Met criteria codes
BA1
This variant is completely absent from all population databases with at least 20x coverage for RUNX1. BA1 is NOT MET.
PM5
This is a synonymous variant, and no other pathogenic variants have been identified at aa position 247. Therefore, PM5 is NOT MET.
PM1
This synonymous variant occurs outside of the conserved runt homology domain (aa 89-204); therefore, PM1 is NOT MET.
PM3
This rule is not applicable for MM-VCEP
PM4
This is a synonymous variant that does not result in protein length changes. As such, PM4 is NOT MET.
PM6
An extensive literature search, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Mastermind and other databases reveal no published literature on this variant. Therefore, no data about de novo occurrences are available. BS4 is NOT MET.
BS2
This rule is not applicable for MM-VCEP
PVS1
This is a synonymous variant, and not a null variant. Therefore, PVS1 is NOT MET.
BS4
An extensive literature search, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Mastermind and other databases reveal no published literature on this variant. Therefore, no segregation data are available. BS4 is NOT MET.
BS3
An extensive literature search, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Mastermind and other databases reveal no published literature on this variant. Therefore, BS3 is NOT MET.
BS1
This variant is completely absent from all population databases with at least 20x coverage for RUNX1. BS1 is NOT MET.
BP2
An extensive literature search, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Mastermind and other databases reveal no published literature on this variant. Therefore, no inheritance data are available. BP2 is NOT MET.
BP3
This rule is not applicable for MM-VCEP
BP1
This rule is not applicable for MM-VCEP
BP5
This rule is not applicable for MM-VCEP
PS1
This is a synonymous variant, and no other pathogenic variants have been identified at aa position 247. Therefore, PS1 is NOT MET.
PS2
An extensive literature search, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Mastermind and other databases reveal no published literature on this variant. Therefore, no data about de novo occurrences are available. BS4 is NOT MET.
PS4
An extensive literature search, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Mastermind and other databases reveal no published literature on this variant. Therefore, no case-control studies are available. PS4 is NOT MET.
PS3
An extensive literature search, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Mastermind and other databases reveal no published literature on this variant. Therefore, PS3 is NOT MET.
PP1
An extensive literature search, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Mastermind and other databases reveal no published literature on this variant. Therefore, no segregation data are available. PP1 is NOT MET.
PP4
This rule is not applicable for MM-VCEP
PP3
This variant is a SYNONYMOUS variant, which does not result in a protein codon change. As such, a REVEL score is not calculable, and there is no predicted effect on protein function. SpliceAI predicted the following: Acceptor loss 0, Donor loss 0, Acceptor gain 0, Donor gain 0. As such, there is no in silico evidence of an effect on splicing. Therefore, PP3 is NOT MET.
PP2
This rule is not applicable for MM-VCEP
Curation History
The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.
¤ Powered by BCM's Genboree.