The ClinGen Evidence Repository is an FDA-recognized human genetic variant database containing expert-curated assertions regarding variants' pathogenicity and supporting evidence summaries. [Disclaimer]


Variant: NM_004360.4(CDH1):c.49-9C>A

CA658798616

516511 (ClinVar)

Gene: CDH1
Condition: CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer
Inheritance Mode: Autosomal dominant inheritance
UUID: 22db38a0-5102-423e-b1e4-3c09530028b3

HGVS expressions

NM_004360.4:c.49-9C>A
NM_004360.4(CDH1):c.49-9C>A
NC_000016.10:g.68738288C>A
CM000678.2:g.68738288C>A
NC_000016.9:g.68772191C>A
CM000678.1:g.68772191C>A
NC_000016.8:g.67329692C>A
NG_008021.1:g.5997C>A
ENST00000261769.10:c.49-9C>A
ENST00000261769.9:c.49-9C>A
ENST00000422392.6:c.49-9C>A
ENST00000566510.5:c.49-9C>A
ENST00000566612.5:c.49-9C>A
ENST00000611625.4:c.49-9C>A
ENST00000612417.4:c.49-9C>A
ENST00000621016.4:c.49-9C>A
NM_004360.3:c.49-9C>A
NM_001317184.1:c.49-9C>A
NM_001317185.1:c.-1567-9C>A
NM_001317186.1:c.-1771-9C>A
NM_004360.5:c.49-9C>A
NM_001317184.2:c.49-9C>A
NM_001317185.2:c.-1567-9C>A
NM_001317186.2:c.-1771-9C>A
NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.49-9C>A

Likely Benign

Met criteria codes 3
BP4 BS2_Supporting PM2_Supporting
Not Met criteria codes 23
BS3 BS1 BS4 PVS1 BP7 BP5 BP3 BP1 BP2 PS3 PS1 PS4 PS2 BA1 PP3 PP2 PP1 PP4 PM6 PM1 PM4 PM5 PM3

Evidence Links 0

Expert Panel

Criteria Specification Information

Criteria Specification: ClinGen CDH1 Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1

Criteria Specification Approval History
Criteria Specifications for this VCEP
Evidence submitted by expert panel
CDH1 VCEP
The c.49-9C>A is an intronic variant in the splice acceptor region of intron 1. This variant is absent in the gnomAD cohort (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been reported in at least three individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2_Supporting; SCV000729557.1, SCV000760811.1). This variant is predicted to have no impact on splicing by multiple in silico splice site predictors. HumanSpliceFinder predicts that this variant may alter an exonic ESE site, but this effect has not been demonstrated experimentally to our knowledge (BP4). In summary, due to the use of the Bayesian point system for this variant with conflicting evidence, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting, BS2_Supporting, BP4.
Met criteria codes
BP4
This variant is predicted to have no impact on splicing by multiple in silico splice site predictors. HumanSpliceFinder predicts that this variant may alter an exonic ESE site, but this effect has not been demonstrated experimentally to our knowledge.
BS2_Supporting
This variant has been observed in at least three individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (SCV000729557.1, SCV000760811.1). At this time, these findings allow the use of BS2_Supporting for this variant.
PM2_Supporting
This variant has not been observed in gnomAD, ExAC, 1000 Genomes or ESP.
Not Met criteria codes
BS3
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature.
BS1
This variant has not been observed in gnomAD.
BS4
To our knowledge, data supporting use of BS4 has not been observed.
PVS1
This rule does not apply to this variant.
BP7
This rule does not apply to this variant.
BP5
Observed in one individual with a likely pathogenic variant in CHEK2 (SCV000729557.1). Due to the moderate-penetrance nature of CHEK2, BP5 has not been applied to this variant.
BP3
This rule does not apply to CDH1.
BP1
This rule does not apply to CDH1.
BP2
To our knowledge, data supporting use of BP2 has not been observed.
PS3
To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature.
PS1
This rule does not apply to this variant.
PS4
To our knowledge, this variant has not been observed in a family meeting HDGC criteria.
PS2
To our knowledge, data supporting use of PS2 has not been observed.
BA1
This variant has not been observed in gnomAD.
PP3
This variant is predicted to have no impact on splicing by multiple in silico splice site predictors. HumanSpliceFinder predicts that this variant may alter an exonic ESE site, but this effect has not been demonstrated experimentally to our knowledge.
PP2
This rule does not apply to CDH1.
PP1
To our knowledge, data supporting use of PP1 has not been observed.
PP4
This rule does not apply to CDH1.
PM6
To our knowledge, data supporting use of PM6 has not been observed.
PM1
This rule does not apply to CDH1.
PM4
This rule does not apply to this variant.
PM5
This rule does not apply to CDH1.
PM3
This rule does not apply to CDH1.
Approved on: 2023-08-18
Published on: 2023-08-18
The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.
¤ Powered by BCM's Genboree.